There was a firewall.
But the management panel was open to the internet.
We verify access restrictions and external accessibility according to business needs with authorized tests.

The institution's services and daily operations continued. Independent control and management visibility was required to ensure current roles and access aligned with mission needs.
Sample scenario · Representative visual produced by artificial intelligenceDiscover the storyWe verify access restrictions and external accessibility according to business needs with authorized tests.
We look beyond backup logs and examine evidence from authorized restoration tests on selected critical systems.
We check the existence of the license as well as the actual coverage, up-to-dateness and effectiveness of protection.
Alongside the operation, we provide scoped independent verification and continuous control visibility.
IT teams handle daily operations, user requests, system maintenance, projects and troubleshooting. siberkobi complements their work with independent assurance, technical findings, action priorities and continuous-control support.
Replies are kept only on this page; It is not sent to the server and is not saved in the browser. This study is not an audit or security score.
Having an invoice for a security product does not mean that the institution is protected. Examine 40 audit scenarios that may also exist in your organization.
These scenarios are prepared for risk awareness. are representative examples. It is not presented as findings that siberkobi has detected in a particular customer in the past.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemHigh cost firewall installed; broad permissions and default rules are not narrowed down to business need.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe management console can be accessed from the internet; The administrator account uses a weak password and MFA is not enabled.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe sample institution received 200 licenses; On 73 devices, the agent was missing, stopped, or disconnected from the console. Numbers are a representative scope example.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe backup tasks appear to be successful; There was no restore test where the application was actually opened.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe directory and VPN accounts of the employee who left six months ago were not closed; The departure process was not reflected in the systems.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemIn the example scenario, 35 privileged accounts are used with password only; critical access is not at the same level of protection.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemProduction servers are running; critical patches have been delayed for a long time due to concerns about operational disruptions.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe RDP service of the accounting server can be accessed directly from the Internet; access source is unrestricted.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemOffice computers and production systems are in the same trust zone; The traffic in between is not limited by business needs.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemSPF, DKIM or DMARC is missing or incorrect on the organization domain; The sender verification policy is not followed.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemVery large groups access employee and customer documents in the public folder; Sensitive files are not parsed.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemA storage or sharing link is accidentally public; sensitive documents are kept in the same area.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe visitor network has a separate name, but the traffic to corporate systems is not limited enough.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemIP cameras and recorders work with manufacturer passwords; It is unclear who is responsible for the devices.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemEvent logs of critical municipal servers do not go to central monitoring; The clocks of different devices do not match either.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThere is a backup product; It is untested who will decide in an incident and in what order the services will be returned.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemEveryday users have unnecessary local administrator privileges on employee computers; Exceptions are not recorded.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemVPN accounts of suppliers whose projects have been completed are open; Expiration date and in-house account owner are not defined.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemCompany laptops lack disk encryption coverage; Management of recovery keys is also unverified.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemMany automations use the same long-lived service account; authorization and password renewal ownership is not defined.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemAccounts used for daily work and old project users remained in the Domain Admin group.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemBackup files of the production database are kept on a share that can be read by many users.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemNetwork sockets in empty offices and common areas are active; It is not checked whether the connected device belongs to the institution or not.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemHigh severity alarms accumulate in the EDR console; The reviewer and response time are not defined.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe same user can create a supplier account, change bank information and confirm payment.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemPLC and engineering interfaces are accessed from different networks; management access paths are not limited to approved scope.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe central log product has been purchased; critical directory, firewall and application resources are not in the connection list.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe manufacturer maintenance connection is always active; There is no access time interval, session confirmation and transaction record.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemOld project groups and personal sharing links of employees who have left or whose duties have changed have not been updated.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemMissing audit trail for critical admin operations on servers; Shared accounts obscure the person making the transaction.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemSeparated zones appear in the network diagram; Since the transition rules are broad, there are no expected limits in practice.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemOlder access points are vulnerable to weak or unsupported wireless security options; The common password has been shared for a long time.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe installation account is active in the newly deployed application; The account owner and password submission process are not defined.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemNetworked printers and scanners are not included in the patch schedule; management interfaces are accessed from large networks.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemCritical application is dependent on the old operating system; Manufacturer security support has ended and no migration plan has been created.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemSecurity and backup notifications are sent to a former employee's address; Delivery or tracking status is not tested.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemIT manager left; Administrator passwords and access keys used by the team have not been renewed.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemNew devices, virtual servers and software services were installed by different teams; There is not a single current record.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemThe rescue plan is on file; There has been no exercise in which services are opened with their dependencies in an alternative environment.
Does this investment really pay off?
invisible problemOld campaign domain names, cloud applications and external services do not appear in the institution's current system list.
Try another word or select all categories.
Is there a situation that sounds familiar to you? Let's check it out together ↗
You know the size of your investment. So, do you know whether this investment really provides security?
We can calculate the expenditure.
We verify effectiveness with evidence.
Amounts are calculated in your device's browser; is not sent to the server. This tool does not calculate ROI or churn rate.
Enter monthly amounts in TL in the fields below.
Enter valid, zero or greater amounts. The upper limit per area is 1 trillion TL.
See your monthly and annual spending by entering the amounts.
Only an independent audit can verify which part of this investment actually provides effective protection.
Measure the Effectiveness of My Investments ↗